These are the main features that I like about the system and why I think it should garner support from those already using ALN or thinking of using ALN.
1) Points are based on a weekly system, not daily. Unused points roll over to the next week and accumulate to a max of 3 x your point allowance
2) Proper scheduling, not like ALN's next day "stack" scheduling
3) Ability to throttle submissions between 5 -20/day. So if you have a new site that you don't want to blast with links you can just dribble the links to it daily**
4) You can select how many times to submit a post, instead of having to repaste. **
5) No PR0 sites. Gregs working on a system for sites that lose PR, to make it worthwhile for site owners to keep the sites in the system and not purge links on the sites
** this functionality has been limited or removed until more sites are in the network,
At the moment there's only 124 sites in the system, with 21 of those PR4 & 1 PR5
You can add sites already registered with ALN, but best IMO to add new sites, so not as to duplicate the ALN network.
Anyway, I think it's worth giving these guys a go. They're super responsive, and keep you in the loop as to what's happening on the network and address any bugs found pretty much straight away.
And no, I've no financial interest in FB, just giving the guys a plug, as I'd like to see a viable alternative to ALN, so as not to be reliant on one network that becomes a single point of failure. This last week with ALN has clearly demonstrated the need for another network. Not taking anything away from Maulana's work over the past year or so, which has been fantastic, but when you're reliant on just one system, you become "hostage" to the systems reliability and the network owners whims.
Edited by BuzzBox, 18 December 2011 - 14:29.















