junkdna, on 27 December 2011 - 05:26, said:
This might be anecdotal, but a friend of mine was doing guest blogging in e-cig market, 6 to 8 hours per day and he was making about $1,500 per month. He subscribed to Google Alerts, and this service was streaming fresh news to him on hourly basis. So he just went around blogs and wrote fresh comments interpreting those news.
Now, he is really nice guy and friendly and all like that. But he eventually had to give up, because he could not scale what he was doing.
I am now in the exactly the same market as he was. I am using just gray SEO and I am already making 4 times as much as him, because with gray SEO one can scale up as much as he likes.
I am not saying that super-white SEO doesn't work, but it is just impossible to scale-up and expensive to implement.
Exactly. And not just that, but why exactly is pure white hat so desirable in the first place? I wasn't aware that SEO was supposed to be some kind of Public Display of Integrity. I hate webspam as much as the next guy but the fact is that 99% of webspam will never be seen by human eyes. It's not there for human eyes--
that's the point. It's there for Googlebot. People's lives won't be affected by most of what we call webspam, so why do we strive so hard to keep to this strict code of "white hat SEO"?
And even if you do try, someone else will grey-hat the $#!% out of you anyway and take all your profit.
White hat isn't worth it--no, not even for the long term. Black hat isn't worth it either. The sweet spot is somewhere in between, and figuring out exactly where to live between the two extremes is my idea of SEO.