REindexing Deindexed Domains? Best Practice?
#1
Posted 14 February 2012 - 17:01
Mystery prize for the best share...
#2
Posted 14 February 2012 - 17:20
#3
Posted 14 February 2012 - 17:24
My favorites are Identi.ca, and Twitter.com
My PR 5 HomePage Backlink Network Is STILL Better Than Yours... Check it out HERE
Still the best SEO Consultants that money can buy.
#4
Posted 14 February 2012 - 18:34
Popular sites like the 2 Shane mentioned above and heaps of others like Digg, Flickr, Tumblr, Craigslist etc..
I have no idea if that would work but if I was going to try that would probably be what I'd try to begin with.
#5
Posted 14 February 2012 - 19:17
Edited by ryanjm, 14 February 2012 - 19:20.
#6
Posted 14 February 2012 - 21:45
Seriously..this is the only thing i can think of, a couple of mine got re-indexed unexpectedly after many months.
SEO Tips,Reviews: http://www.1up-seo.com - Article Spinning Service
#7
Posted 14 February 2012 - 22:25
If you're already screwed, what's the harm in trying to work with Big G at that point? It's not like they can de-index you even "worse".
#8
Posted 15 February 2012 - 01:02
#9
Posted 15 February 2012 - 03:48
ryanjm, on 14 February 2012 - 19:17, said:
Would you mind pm'ing me? I recently lost a $200 per day site... promise I wont make it public
#10
Posted 15 February 2012 - 07:44
You can do all of this too without changing hosting, etc, but doing that you have a better chance at getting Google to reconsider.
Also, someone mentioned that their sites where deindexed, what you did is you probably made changes so that you were following Google's guidelines, they crawled the sites and say you were following the rules, and that was it.
#11
#12
Posted 16 February 2012 - 22:18
DailyMail, on 15 February 2012 - 01:02, said:
Definitely. One of them kept all the content the same, but changed the layout and changed the navigation a bit. Google got back, told them of anything else they needed to fix, they did it and were back in business in less than a month.
Not bad since there is nothing to lose. Literally.
#13
Posted 22 February 2012 - 08:54
ryanjm, on 16 February 2012 - 17:19, said:
it wasnt the content making me money, it was the backlinks
so no way to get this done without submitting a reconsideration request? I cant do that as the amount of backlinks I built.. well, i dont think that would reinclude the site regardless of what content i put on there...
Edited by Dan, 22 February 2012 - 08:55.
#14
Posted 22 February 2012 - 18:25
TerryKyle, on 14 February 2012 - 17:01, said:
Mystery prize for the best share...
Terry,
I would ditch the bitch. I remember seeing a video or blog post of Matt Cutts warning people about buying domains that had been deindexed. Face it, the domain was probably deindexed due to some kind of trust/spam/cloaking etc. issue with Google. Cutts was warning people that once a site's trust is lost because it was spam or because it linked to known spam/malware/bad neighborhood or for some other egregious error, that site may struggle to perform well again even if it has new ownership. He claimed that the past history of the domain sticks with the domain for a long time, even after apparent ownership transfer. I seem to recall him even suggesting to someone that they should consider registering or looking for a different domain based on their circumstances.
So if the domain was de-indexed for spam, maybe ditch it. If it was deindexed because of some other reason like the site being down for too long, then I suppose you could reindex it pretty dang easily with one decent link.
I searched Google for the piece, but was unable to find it. Maybe it was buried in some other video about a different topic. Maybe it was a QNA session at some conference.
Take it for what it is worth. I am going off memory here. Or maybe I just dreamed it last night and think it was real. Or maybe I was wasted and invented the story. Or maybe I was wasted and some noob told the story and I believed him. OR maybe too much LSD/shrooms/hash/weed in my youth? Or...WTF?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users













