[seriento]

Hi all

Just downloaded this podcast called SEO 101.. some super white hat nerds talking about how bad the type of SEO that most people on this forum probably use. Slating crap and spun content, although I'm pretty sure it has been proven that quality isn't all that important (yet), but uniqueness is?

Anyway, just wondering what on earth these guys are implying you should be using to rank if not paying for links, not using networks, not spinning content etc etc etc.?? Either they use some super secret tactics, or they just like to make out they are SUPER white hat when in reality, they do the same as us..

All he bangs on about is social stuff which is the same as Matt Cutts but we all know that's kind of nonsense. Sure social stuff is good but for the amount of effort required when you can rank using the services and methods on this forum (bmr, aln, hpbl's, amr, senuke etc.) is it even worth it?

[seriento]

bump...

[Fishingman1]

Matts evil twin perhaps
There is no way to rank naturally according to G TOS it would take around 100 years.
Of course the only alternative is PPC, now who would benefit from that
it sounds like a con job.
Delete it.

[Lynch]

Hehehe basic marketing 101 you first trash the existing methods even if they work, then you make it hard and painful, and then you present the cure. Plus you don't say it the first time so people's buttons get pushed, they can't sleep at night and so on. If you want to immunize your self from these ehum opportunists, learn some copywritting.