[ExtremistOak]

As we do not have an official thread on trafficplanet for ArticleRanks.com

Thought it would time to create one with some great news for free members

As you are well aware we have been rewarding users who add their sites into the system since we launched - We have now got to a stage where we can reward free users better and offer more credits to sites with PR being added to the system. The new breakdown for credits is as follows

PR1 receive 0.10 per published article
PR2 receive 0.20 per published article
PR3 receive 0.30 per published article
PR4 receive 0.40 per published article
PR5 receive 0.50 per published article
PR6 receive 0.60 per published article
PR7 receive 3.00 per published article
PR8 receive 4.00 per published article
PR9 receive 5.00 per published article
PR10 receive 6.00 per published article

This means if you have added 1 PR3 site you would need to publish 7 pieces of content to submit one piece of spun content into the network which will get published anywhere between 20-100+ times.

On top of this free members can now promote upto 6 domains in their live articles

We thank the free members for helping the network grow over the last few years and this is our way to say thank you.

Edited by Musa_Aykac, 14 March 2012 - 12:45.

[stevejones003]

What is the mean PR of AR n/w now a days?

[Cedric]

stevejones003, on 17 January 2012 - 10:50, said:

What is the mean PR of AR n/w now a days?

lol PR still has a meaning. Doesn't mean it's the most important thing in the world but it still has a significance.

[stevejones003]

Cedric, on 17 January 2012 - 10:54, said:

lol PR still has a meaning. Doesn't mean it's the most important thing in the world but it still has a significance.

mean="average"
stats lingo

[infocraze]

Cedric, on 17 January 2012 - 10:54, said:

lol PR still has a meaning. Doesn't mean it's the most important thing in the world but it still has a significance.

He is asking for the average PR of the network. I would also want to know this so we can include AR in our portfolio.

[ExtremistOak]

Cedric, on 17 January 2012 - 10:54, said:

lol PR still has a meaning. Doesn't mean it's the most important thing in the world but it still has a significance.

Since we launched in 2009 we have never given the number and amount of sites in the network as this opens prying eyes especially Google's :-)

But I will just say that the PR of the network is stronger then ever including the higher end PR's PR5+

But we also do publish to PR0 and PR1's - I mean why not? There is no cap on each articles distribution so giving them even distribution is good

I know this may sound a little bad but we have not personally contributed to the network in about 3 months now as we have been building up linkauthority (we usually do monthly) - But we have a batch load of PR3 and PR4's we are going to add at the beginning of February

But even so in the last 30 days tons of sites have been added by users (By sites this also includes social accounts we syndicate too)

Edited by Musa_Aykac, 17 January 2012 - 13:51.

[Cedric]

lol sorry, too used to seeing people write bad English..

[Charybdis]

An import function would be good (like in Build my rank).

[ExtremistOak]

Charybdis, on 17 January 2012 - 11:57, said:

An import function would be good (like in Build my rank).

Is this for Articleranks? Or do you mean one for linkauthority?

[ExtremistOak]

Measures we take to to protect the network and detection of the network

- Posting to categories
- Having category specific sites
- Spam algothirm which prevents chronic spammers from syndicating garbage
- Building links to published articles and pinging and RSS/XML feeds
- Users spam prevention contribution - user junks, blocks etc all get fed into the algothirm
- Ability for site owners to accept highly spun content 300%+
- Multiple authors so we are not just publishing with the same author again and again
- Filters for people try to submit with bots
- Trust lists and blacklists

The spam algothirm has taken years to tweak and refine and we are constantly improving it

[Charybdis]

Musa_Aykac, on 17 January 2012 - 13:28, said:

Is this for Articleranks? Or do you mean one for linkauthority?

Both

[Charybdis]

What is the current indexation rate?

[ExtremistOak]

Charybdis, on 18 January 2012 - 13:30, said:

Both

We are looking to implement it for linkauthority in the next coming months

Charybdis, on 18 January 2012 - 13:32, said:

What is the current indexation rate?

LinkAuthority - 100%
ArticleRanks - Very hard to say as we publish so many daily on ArticleRanks that its hard to keep track of (I did however run an analysis on a project of ours many months back and we had a 40% index rate - However since then we have implemented pinging, XML and RSS to all published urls so this has gone up probably 15-25%) - So if AR syndicates your content to 50 sites you should see 15-30 indexed and the rest picked up on analysis tools like majestic seo or open site crawler

[Charybdis]

Why don't you give me the list of URLs my articles were published on?

High PR Society (another blog networks) states:

Quote

Do I get a list of URLs that my links appear on?

YES! Don’t believe the BS that other vendors may say about not sharing their network. You can always trace back your links in Google Webmaster Tools and of course Google could find out every site in the network with only one site and 15 minutes of programming. We show you every link that is build so you can add it to Linklicious.me, build more backlinks to these high quality links, or whatever else you may want to do.

It doesn't protect your network at all that you don't provide a report. It just makes backlinking more difficult.

[ExtremistOak]

Charybdis, on 01 February 2012 - 11:16, said:

Why don't you give me the list of URLs my articles were published on?

High PR Society (another blog networks) states:





It doesn't protect your network at all that you don't provide a report. It just makes backlinking more difficult.

It does protect the network and it protects users submitted sites and privacy - Google webmaster tools shows limited data so I dont know what high pr society is saying there (maybe just trying to up sell their other service too)

[googlealchemist]

Charybdis, on 01 February 2012 - 11:16, said:

Why don't you give me the list of URLs my articles were published on?

High PR Society (another blog networks) states:


It doesn't protect your network at all that you don't provide a report. It just makes backlinking more difficult.

I would have to agree with this, not to ruffle any feathers. To think G cant submit a test domain and then reverse eng the backlinks is absurd. Just because they show limited data in webmasters tools, that is irrelevant as to what data they have and use for themselves.

I would say a good thing about it would be preventing stupid people from taking their blog posts and overspamming them in some ridiculous way and causing a red flag or deindexing of the site, so it still has merit imo, just not the standard proposed one.

[VBM]

Hello Musa (Merhaba Musa if I am not mistaken )

ArticleRanks has been down all day long,when are you going to fix it?

[ExtremistOak]

VBM, on 09 February 2012 - 07:17, said:

Hello Musa (Merhaba Musa if I am not mistaken )

ArticleRanks has been down all day long,when are you going to fix it?

Merhaba :-)

Articleranks is not down however we are experiencing a few slow load issues and are working to fix it ASAP

[heyman]

I had completely forgotten about my ArticleRanks account. Turns out, I have over 2,000 credits in my account! Time to post some articles to one of the better article networks I've been apart of.

[Percival Grigori]

If you own a blog and need fresh content Articleranks is good for that since you can set it to manually approve all new posts. That's what I do. I don't even post on the network, I just get content for one of my blogs that I don't have the time to write for. It's PR1 now, most likely due to always having fresh content every week via Article Ranks. I just go on my dashboard every week, approve the articles I want to publish and reject the ones that are not in the same niche (or are too badly spun).